ABSTRACT
Background. COVID-19 pneumonia can be indistinguishable from other infectious respiratory etiologies, so providers are challenged with deciding whether empiric antibiotics should be prescribed to hospitalized patients with SARS-CoV-2. This study aimed to evaluate predictors of respiratory bacterial co-infections (RBCI) in hospitalized patients with COVID-19. Methods. Retrospective study evaluating COVID-19 inpatients from Feb 1, 2020 to Sept 30, 2020 at a tertiary academic medical center. Patients with RBCI were matched with three COVID-19 inpatients lacking RBCI admitted within 7 days of each other. The primary objectives of this study were to determine the prevalence of and identify variables associated with RBCI in COVID-19 inpatients. Secondary outcomes included length of stay and mortality. Data collected included demographics;inflammatory markers;bacterial culture/antigen results;antibiotic exposure;and COVID-19 severity. Wilcoxon rank sum, Chi Square tests, or Fisher's exact tests were utilized as appropriate. A multivariable logistic regression (MLR) model was conducted to identify covariates associated with RBCI. Results. Seven hundred thirty-five patients were hospitalized with COVID-19 during the study period. Of these, 82 (11.2%) had RBCI. Fifty-seven of these patients met inclusion criteria and were matched to three patients lacking RBCI (N = 228 patients). Patients with RBCI were more likely to receive antibiotics [57 (100%) vs. 130 (76%), p < 0.0001] and for a longer cumulative duration [19 (13-33) vs. 8 (4-13) days, p < 0.0001] compared to patients lacking RBCI. The MLR model revealed risk factors of RBCI to be admission from SNF/LTAC/NH (AOR 6.8, 95% CI 2.6-18.2), severe COVID-19 (AOR 3.03, 95% CI 0.78-11.9), and leukocytosis (AOR 3.03, 95% CI 0.99-1.16). Conclusion. Although RBCI is rare in COVID-19 inpatients, antibiotic use is common. COVID-19 inpatients may be more likely to have RBCI if they are admitted from a SNF/LTAC/NH, have severe COVID-19, or present with leukocytosis. Early and prompt recognition of RBCI predictors in COVID-19 inpatients may facilitate timely antimicrobial therapy while improving antimicrobial stewardship among patients at low risk for co-infection.
ABSTRACT
Background. Limited options currently exist for treatment of patients diagnosed with symptomatic coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19). Monoclonal antibody therapy (MAT) has been investigated as a therapeutic option for symptomatic COVID-19 patients in the outpatient setting at high-risk for progression to severe disease based on emergency use authorization (EUA) criteria. No published studies have compared outcomes for patients treated with different MAT for COVID-19. Methods. This was a single-center, retrospective cohort study at The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center to compare COVID-19-related emergency room (ER) visits, admissions, and mortality at 30 days after MAT infusion for adult patients with symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 between November 16, 2020 and February 2, 2021 who received bamlanivimab versus those who received casirivimab-imdevimab. Statistical analysis used logistic regression analysis to determine the odds ratio (OR) to evaluate the relationship between patient characteristics, MAT, and outcomes. Results. The cohort included 943 patients with SARS-CoV-2 who received MAT, including 658 patients who received bamlanivimab and 285 who received casirivimab-imdevimab. Outcome results between patients who received bamlanivimab and casirivimab-imdevimab showed no statistically significant difference seen in the number of COVID-19 related ER visits (3.2% vs 3.5%, p = 0.80), hospital admissions (4.6% vs 2.8%, p = 0.21), or mortality (0.5% vs 0.7%, p = 0.63). Multivariate analysis showed no statistically significant difference in outcomes between the groups when accounting for potential confounders. As reflected in the Table, chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), gender, and asthma were associated with increased COVID-19 related ER visit within 30 days of infusion and age, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, CLL, and lupus were associated with increased risk for COVID-19 related admission within 30 days of infusion. Age and obesity with body mass index greater than 35 mg/ kg2 were associated with increased risk for COVID-19 related mortality at 30 days. Conclusion. COVID-19 related outcomes were similar when comparing patients with COVID-19 treated with bamlanivimab versus those treated with casirivimab-imdevimab.
ABSTRACT
Background. Monoclonal antibody therapy (MAT) was granted Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for treatment of mild to moderate coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in adults with positive SARSCoV-2 viral testing and at high risk for progression to severe COVID-19 with up to 10 days of symptoms. This study assessed the impact of MAT on COVID-19-related ER visits, admissions, and mortality for patients diagnosed with COVID-19. Methods. This was a single-center, retrospective study at The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center to compare COVID-19-related ER visits, admissions, and mortality at 30 days after receiving MAT in the outpatient setting with either bamlanivimab or casirivimab-imdevimab in adult patients diagnosed with SARS-CoV-2 between November 16, 2020 and February 2, 2021. Outcomes in patients who received MAT were compared to those of a control group of patients diagnosed with COVID-19 in the outpatient setting from May 16, 2020 through November 15, 2020 who would have qualified for MAT through EUA criteria had it been available. Statistical analysis used logistic regression analysis with backward selection to determine the odds ratios (OR) and the 95% confidence interval to evaluate the relationship between patient clinical characteristics and outcomes. Results. This study cohort included 1,944 patients, including 943 who received MAT and 1,001 in the control group. The MAT group included 658 who received bamlanivimab and 285 who received casirivimab-imdevimab. Patients who received MAT compared to the control group had a lower rate of COVID-19 related ER visits (3.3% vs 7.4%, p = < 0.0001) and hospital admissions (4.0% vs 7.8%, p = < 0.0001). No statistically significant difference was seen in mortality between the MAT group (0.5%) and control group (1.1%, p = 0.17). After accounting for potential confounders, the difference between the monoclonal antibody and control groups remained significant for ER visits and hospital admissions as reflected in the table. Conclusion. Patients who received MAT for COVID-19 in the outpatient setting had a lower rate of COVID-19-related 30 day ER visits and hospitalizations compared to those who did not receive MAT, adjusting for potential confounders.